UX CASE STUDY  ·  PRODUCT DESIGN  ·  NONPROFIT  ·  WEBSITE REDESIGN

IAGD —
Accessible Geoscience
Resource Hub

I led a mobile-first redesign of IAGD’s resource site for a 15,000+ person geoscience community. The work replaced inconsistent page structures with six reusable, accessible page types that are easier to navigate and maintain.

IAGD's redesigned site on three mobile screens — Resources & Learning, Accessible Geology Field Experiences, and Blind & Low Vision Resources

Overview

IAGD is a nonprofit that improves access and inclusion for people with disabilities in the geosciences. Its site had useful resources, but similar content was organized through different page structures and navigation patterns.

Before

Similar content used inconsistent layouts and pathways, making resources harder to navigate and the site harder for the IAGD team to maintain.

After

Six reusable page types share navigation and accessibility patterns, making resources easier to find and simpler for the team to maintain.

Outcome: Built to scale after handoff

6

Reusable Page Types

Shared structures for recurring content

3 → 1

Field Trip Template

Three inconsistent formats standardized into one

M→D

Responsive System

One structure across screen sizes

Accessibility

Shared Interaction Rules

Across navigation, components, and content

My Role
Lead Product Designer
Ownership
Research
Page-system architecture
Accessibility
Content standardization
Team
3 Designers
2 Engineers
Project Manager
Technical Manager
Timeline
Oct 2025 – Feb 2026
Tools
Figma
RESEARCH + PROCESS DECK
IAGD
See the research, audits, and design decisions behind the redesign in the Figma deck.
View the Figma deck

THE PROBLEM

The site was difficult
to navigate and maintain.

Dense pages, unclear navigation, and inconsistent structures made it harder for users to find resources and harder for a volunteer team to keep the site consistent.

Hard to find and scan

Dense content and unclear pathways gave users no obvious place to start.

Hard to maintain and scale

Similar pages followed different structures, so volunteers had to manage them page by page.

APPROACH

How I approached
the redesign.

I used research and content audits to define shared rules for navigation, page structure, accessibility, and content.

Research

Research defined the structural requirements

Site and competitive audits, stakeholder discovery, interviews, affinity mapping, and personas identified recurring user and content needs.

Accessibility

Accessibility rules were applied across the system

Progressive disclosure, breadcrumbs, external-link signals, and icon-plus-label patterns were built into the shared components.

Page-System Strategy

Six reusable page types replaced one-off layouts

Each page type was structured around what users needed to understand or do at that level.

Content Standardization

Three field trip formats became one template

Comparing the existing pages revealed repeated content patterns that could share one hierarchy.

THE FINAL SOLUTION

The final system.

Five design outcomes show how the new structure works across page types and screen sizes.

01

Shared structure across page types.

Six page types use shared component and hierarchy rules, so volunteers can add content without redesigning each page.

Three resource page types using the
same structure with different content.

Navigating the nested hubs: parent
to category to resource.

02

Clearer paths to resources.

Category accordions, resource labels, and nested pages help users move from broad topics to specific resources.

03

One field trip template.

Three inconsistent field trip formats were consolidated into one reusable detail-page structure.

Field trip archive to a standardized detail page.

04

One system across screen sizes.

The same page structure adapts from mobile to desktop without separate layouts.

Desktop view of the same page structure used on mobile.

05

Consistent accessibility patterns

Progressive disclosure, breadcrumbs, and icon-plus-label patterns are used consistently across the resource hierarchy.

Accordions, breadcrumbs, and labeled-link patterns
 applied within the resource hierarchy.

REFLECTION

What this project
taught me.

Define structure before layout

Defining each page type’s purpose and hierarchy before designing layouts made it easier to reuse components and keep content order consistent.

Maintenance affects accessibility

For a volunteer-run site, accessibility depends on what happens after handoff. A system that is difficult to update will become less consistent and harder to use.

Content audits reveal system patterns

Comparing legacy pages side by side exposed repeated structures and exceptions. That showed what could be standardized and what needed to stay flexible.

Previous — GramCity
Next case study
Good Help
An offline-first app that helps people find essential community services.
CONTENTS