UX CASE STUDY  ·  PRODUCT DESIGN  ·  NONPROFIT  ·  WEBSITE REDESIGN

IAGD
Accessible Geoscience
Resource Hub

A mobile-first redesign for a disability-inclusion nonprofit, reaching 15,000+ geoscience professionals, students, and educators, turning dense, inconsistent content into a scalable, accessible system.

IAGD's redesigned site on three mobile screens — Resources & Learning, Accessible Geology Field Experiences, and Blind & Low Vision Resources

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The International Association for Geoscience Diversity (IAGD) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit improving access and inclusion for people with disabilities in the geosciences.

IAGD's site held valuable resources for 15,000+ people, but no system to deliver them. I led the redesign from research through a scalable, accessible page system, now delivered and awaiting rollout.

Before

Outdated, inconsistent pages with no shared structure.

After

One reusable, accessible page system a volunteer team can maintain.

My Role
Lead Product Designer
Ownership
Research
Page-system architecture
Accessibility
Content standardization
Team
3 Designers
2 Engineers
Project Manager
Technical Manager
Timeline
Oct 2025 – Feb 2026
Tools
Figma

Outcome: Built to scale after handoff

6

 Reusable Page Families

Purpose-driven structures across the site

Reusable

Content Templates

Consistent hierarchy, flexible content

M→D

 Responsive Framework

Mobile-first through desktop

Built In

Accessibility Rules

Embedded across components + patterns

Full Case Study
IAGD
Want the research, artifacts, and decision-making behind the system? It's all in the Figma deck
View the Figma deck

THE PROBLEM

Valuable content.
No system to deliver it.

Dense pages, unclear navigation, and inconsistent structures made resources difficult to find, and difficult for a volunteer-run organization to maintain.

Hard to find and scan

Dense content and unclear pathways gave users no obvious place to start.

Hard to maintain and scale

Similar pages followed different structures, forcing volunteers to relearn the site page by page.

Process, At A Glance

The short version.

Research became system rules. Those rules became reusable page structures.

Research

I led the research
track end-to-end

Site + competitive audit, stakeholder discovery, interviews, affinity mapping, and personas established the rules the redesign had to follow.

Page-System Strategy

Six reusable page
families, each with a job

Instead of designing pages one by one, I defined repeatable structures around what users needed to accomplish at each level.

Content Standardization

Three trip structures
became one template

A focused Trip Detail audit exposed the inconsistency; pattern comparison and stakeholder validation turned it into one reusable hierarchy.

Accessibility

Accessibility
shaped the system

Progressive disclosure, breadcrumbs, explicit external-link signals, and icon + label pairing were built into the interaction model.

THE FINAL SOLUTION

A system you can
actually use.

Five outcomes, each one shown in motion through the final design.

01

A scalable page system.

New content can be added by volunteers without redesigning anything. The same component rules apply across every page family.

Three resource pages, one structure: content
swapped, components reused.

Navigating the nested hubs: parent
to category to resource.

02

Improved discoverability.

Category-based accordions, resource type labels, and nested hub hierarchy mean users find what they need without scanning a wall of links.

03

Standardized templates.

Inconsistent content types unified into reusable templates. Every page now has a defined purpose and pattern.

Field trip archive to a standardized detail page.

04

Mobile-first, desktop-ready.

Layouts that expand to desktop using the same system rules, no exceptions, no rebuilds. The system breathes wherever it lives.

The system breathing in a wider viewport.

05

Accessibility built into structure.

Progressive disclosure, breadcrumbs, icon labeling, no horizontal scroll, supporting screen reader users through structure, not an afterthought.

Accordions and breadcrumbs in action:
progressive disclosure, icon labeling in cards.

REFLECTION

What this project
taught me.

Structure before surface

Defining purpose and hierarchy before layout made the system easier to scale. Once each page family had a clear job, its components and content order followed.

Maintainability is accessibility

Accessibility has to survive handoff. For a volunteer-run organization, a system that’s difficult to update will eventually become inaccurate, inconsistent, and harder to use.

The audit is the research

Reconstructing legacy content exposed patterns that weren’t visible page by page. Comparing those structures turned the audit into evidence for what should be standardized and what needed to stay flexible.

Previous — GramCity
Next case study
Good Help
An offline-first app that helps people find essential community services.
CONTENTS